![]() |
Peter Wilcock and Saffron Walden Constituency Liberal Democrats Serving the community across Uttlesford, Broomfield & Writtle |
![]() |
| Peter Wilcock and Saffron Walden Constituency Liberal Democrats | <info@saffronwaldenlibdems.org.uk> |
Uttlesford District Council To Discuss Eco-Town On 17 March10.42.00am GMT Sat 14th Mar 2009
Uttlesford District Council's environment committee is to address the government's present consultation on eco-towns at its meeting at 7.30 p.m. next Tuesday, March 17th. You can find the agenda and paper for item 7 at: http://ggpweb.uttlesford.gov.uk/CMISWebPublic/Meeting.aspx?meetingID=8771 There would have been no agenda item on this most crucial and controversial subject had one not been requested by Elsenham and Henham councillor Catherine Dean. The council's Conservative adminstration was apparently content to let the whole consultation (which was about to close but has now been extended to 30 April) to pass by with only the procedural comment it made last year - that it was content that any planning decision will have to be handled by UDC (if it gets so far). The report to be found at the above link cannot be described as an analytical response to the government's proposal for a 5000-home eco-town at NE Elsenham. It concentrates on procedural matters and issues of general principle for any eco-town. Most of the report simply repeats what has been said in the government's own financial viability report; that the eco-town MIGHT be able to pay for itself and some local infrastructure improvements. There is nothing to say whether the eco-town makes sense for Uttlesford people at the proposed location or any rebuttal of the developer's and the government's proposals beyond some questions about renewable energy and whether the plan really is to pump water all the way from Colchester. The report is the equivalent of UDC responding to the second runway proposal at Stansted by saying only that the government should review its policy on aircraft engine design. So whereas local residents have been commenting on the realities of the eco-town for this area, Uttlesford District Council, which is the official planning body for this area, seems to be content to stay largely silent rather than to act as a democratic voice for local people. Cllr Alan Dean comments: "I have written to complain about the apparent lack of objectivity by Uttlesford's planning department. I am sure that silence by UDC on this crucial issue will be interpreted by the developer and the government as acceptance by the council of an eco-town at Elsenham". Residents are urged to attend Tuesday's meeting.
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Fri 5th Feb 2010: Uttlesford Council backs away from inflation-busting tax increase Mon 31st Aug 2009: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE LEADER OF UTTLESFORD DISTRICT COUNCIL, COUNCILLOR JIM KETTERIDGE Mon 24th Nov 2008: Eco-town Back in Uttlesford's Court as Paper says 'It Makes No Sense' Mon 10th Nov 2008: Uttlesford Council Has 6th Best Recycling Rate in UK Sun 13th Jan 2008: Sun 6th Jan 2008: Come along on Monday evening (7 January) to question Uttlesford on the Conservative new town plan! Sat 29th Dec 2007: Developers Target Uttlesford as Tories Back-Track on Eco-Town Tue 6th Mar 2007: County Council Challenged On Street Lights for Uttlesford Thu 15th Feb 2007: 2% District Council Tax Increase A Good Deal For Local Residents Mon 24th Oct 2005: Uttlesford Lib Dem Council Leader at Night Flights Rally Sat 17th Sep 2005: Uttlesford District Council Restore Grants to Towns Over 1,000 Population Fri 16th Sep 2005: Make your point to the District Council Sun 11th Sep 2005: Lib Dem Uttlesford is Lowest for Council Tax Related Press Articles:Sat 8th Dec 2007: Who is running the shop at Uttlesford District Council? Sun 1st Jan 2006: Uttlesford District Council's Response on Post 25mppa Growth At Stansted Airport Published and promoted by Paul Westlake on behalf of Peter Wilcock and Saffron Walden Constituency Liberal Democrats at 32 Lambert Cross, Saffron Walden. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |