![]() |
Peter Wilcock and Saffron Walden Constituency Liberal Democrats Serving the community across Uttlesford, Broomfield & Writtle |
![]() |
| Peter Wilcock and Saffron Walden Constituency Liberal Democrats | <info@saffronwaldenlibdems.org.uk> |
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE LEADER OF UTTLESFORD DISTRICT COUNCIL, COUNCILLOR JIM KETTERIDGE10.02.19pm BST (GMT +0100) Mon 31st Aug 2009
The editorial comment column in the Dunmow and Stansted Observer of 27 August called for planning of homes in Uttlesford for our children's future to be based on 'clear evidence and objective evaluation' without the 'suspicion of politics governing planning'. We agree. In fact we have been calling for an open and informed debate on the location of housing in the Uttlesford district for over two years. The undersigned elected members of the council and the public of Uttlesford have so far been denied that opportunity. Two of the undersigned wrote to Councillor Barker on 18th July offering cooperation in re-examining all housing options in the light of road access problems at Elsenham contained in the recently published housing land availability study. This study shows that sufficient suitable land exists to accommodate the district's housing commitments without the need for a new town. Councillor Barker has not replied to the letter some six weeks later. This and other factors were due to be discussed by councillors at a housing workshop promised for 1st September in advance of further public consultation in the autumn. At the eleventh hour we were told that the workshop was cancelled because consultants have not finished studies that would inform the discussion. We have also been informed that the public consultation has been put back until 2010. This procrastination sends a message to the public of either incompetence by the council and/or its consultants or that the process is being deliberately manipulated for party political purposes. Many residents of the district have seen their lives blighted by your proclamation of support for an 'eco-community' two years ago. Residents have also been blighted by BAA's airport plans, but they neither expect nor deserve a self-imposed blight by their own planning authority. They want an end to uncertainty. They, like us, want competent planning from Uttlesford. Through this open letter we call on you to provide the leadership that is the responsibility of the office you hold. We call on you to put aside party politics and act on behalf of present and future residents of Uttlesford. We ask you immediately to ensure objective and reliable evidence followed by transparent discussion on where future homes might best be provided. Yours sincerely Cllr Alan Dean, Stansted South Cllr Catherine Dean, Elsenham & Henham Cllr John Hudson, Stansted South Cllr David Morson, Elsenham & Henham Cllr Geoffrey Sell, Stansted North
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Fri 5th Feb 2010: Uttlesford Council backs away from inflation-busting tax increase Sat 14th Mar 2009: Uttlesford District Council To Discuss Eco-Town On 17 March Mon 10th Nov 2008: Uttlesford Council Has 6th Best Recycling Rate in UK Sun 13th Jan 2008: Wed 28th Nov 2007: Open Letter to Sir Alan Haselhurst MP Wed 10th Oct 2007: Climb down by Cllr Ketteridge. Nothing to discuss! Tue 6th Mar 2007: County Council Challenged On Street Lights for Uttlesford Thu 15th Feb 2007: 2% District Council Tax Increase A Good Deal For Local Residents Mon 24th Oct 2005: Uttlesford Lib Dem Council Leader at Night Flights Rally Sat 17th Sep 2005: Uttlesford District Council Restore Grants to Towns Over 1,000 Population Fri 16th Sep 2005: Make your point to the District Council Sun 11th Sep 2005: Lib Dem Uttlesford is Lowest for Council Tax Related Press Articles:Sat 8th Dec 2007: Who is running the shop at Uttlesford District Council? Sun 1st Jan 2006: Uttlesford District Council's Response on Post 25mppa Growth At Stansted Airport Published and promoted by Paul Westlake on behalf of Peter Wilcock and Saffron Walden Constituency Liberal Democrats at 32 Lambert Cross, Saffron Walden. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |